Skip to main content
· 7/20/2010

Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC.

Citations

  • 785 N.W.2d 805
  • 72 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 755
  • 2010 Minn. App. LEXIS 110
  • 2010 WL 2813532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment of misrepresentation by omission claim because drill manufacturer did not have special knowledge of material facts at the time drill was purchased
  • “An implied warranty of fitness for intended use arises if a seller, at the time of a contract, has reason to know that the buyer has a particular purpose for the goods purchased, and the buyer relies on the seller’s judgment or skill to select those goods.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toussaint, Hudson, Willis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.