Driscoll v. Gheewalla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence in the record irnplicitly supports a finding that rigid enforcement of the ordinance would prevent the owners from realizing a reasonable return on the property
• upholding agency finding because record implicitly supported such a finding even though no express finding existed
• upholding agency finding because record implicitly supported such a finding even though no express finding existed
• “in the circumstances of this record the necessary implicit findings to sustain the Board’s decision fully appear”
• Second application for variance filed less than one month after denial of first barred by terms of Ordinance and principles of res judicata
• modified proposal for zoning variance filed less than one month after first application contained significant changes in setbacks and building dimensions, and therefore was not barred by ordinance requiring six-month delay between successive applications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).