Skip to main content
· 1/7/1926

Drinkard v. Anderton

Citations

  • 280 S.W. 1076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In the absence of a statutory definition, this Court infers that the legislature intended no special meaning for the word but, instead, intended that it be given its ordinary meaning— its common dictionary definition.” (citation omitted)
  • applying rule against inserting language into a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.