· 9/9/1976
Drink, Inc. v. Martinez
Citations
- 556 P.2d 348
- 89 N.M. 662
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- parol evidence rule does not bar extrinsic evidence for purpose of determining whether by mistake there was no consent to the apparent agreement
- enforcement of option to purchase held unconscionable as to property not subject to original lease
- “parol evidence may always be introduced to establish that the document is not the true agreement of the parties”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montoya, Sosa, Easley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.