Skip to main content
· 9/9/1976

Drink, Inc. v. Martinez

Citations

  • 556 P.2d 348
  • 89 N.M. 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parol evidence rule does not bar extrinsic evidence for purpose of determining whether by mistake there was no consent to the apparent agreement
  • enforcement of option to purchase held unconscionable as to property not subject to original lease
  • “parol evidence may always be introduced to establish that the document is not the true agreement of the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montoya, Sosa, Easley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.