Skip to main content
· 1/31/1992

Driebe v. Cox

Citations

  • 416 S.E.2d 314
  • 203 Ga. App. 8
  • 26 Fulton County D. Rep. 21
  • 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • seller had no claim against buyer's attorney for negligence in drafting deed because the seller knew the attorney represented the buyer
  • seller had no claim against buyer’s attorney for negligence in drafting deed because the seller knew the attorney represented the buyer
  • a party with his own lawyer representing him in a transaction may not choose to limit his attorney's role and then rely on the attorney for the other party in that transaction
  • a party with his own lawyer representing him in a transaction may not choose to limit his attorney’s role and then rely on the attorney for the other party in that transaction
  • “[T]he trend in Georgia has been to relax the rule of strict contractual privity in malpractice actions, recognizing that under certain circumstances, professionals owe a duty of reasonable care to parties who are not their clients.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Birdsong, Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.