Dreyfus v. Hirt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence that the appellant was near the crime scene at the time of the murder and shortly thereafter tried to pawn items that belonged to the victim was constitutionally sufficient to support his conviction for malice murder
• whether an alternative hypothesis was a reasonable one under OCGA § 24-4-6 was principally a question for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).