Dreyer v. Ryder Automotive Carrier Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]n otherwise well-credentialed expert’s opinion may be subject to disqualification if he fails to employ investigative techniques or cannot explain the technical basis for his opinion”
• noting that \[a]n otherwise well-credentialed expert's opinion may be subject to disqualification if he fails to employ investigative techniques or cannot explain the technical basis for his opinion\
• noting that “motions concerning the admissibility of expert testimony at trial” are “non-dispositive”
• applying the “clearly erroneous or contrary to law” standard to assess a magistrate judge’s recommendation to disqualify prospective expert witnesses from testifying at trial
• excluding expert testimony under Rule 403 where the expert’s “proposed opinion and testimony . . . constitutes unsupported speculation offered by a proposed expert on a subject outside his field of claimed expertise”
• expert presented calculations of “injury per exposure frequency rate” using “accident data derived from Defendants’ records” without verifying the data

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).