Dreyer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A claim administrator’s] reliance on the opinion of a non-treating psychiatrist who reviewed the Plaintiff’s medical information was not arbitrary or capricious.”
• “In light of defendants’ many requests for additional information [including recent medical documentation], it is to Dreyer’s detriment that she did not submit evidence that she was unable to perform the essential functions as an administrative assistant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).