Drexel v. Berney
Citations
- 122 U.S. 241
- 7 S. Ct. 1200
- 30 L. Ed. 1219
- 1887 U.S. LEXIS 2105
Syllabus
<p>In order to justify a resort to a court of equity for the enforcement of an equitable estoppel, some ground of equity, other than the estoppel itself, must be shown whereby the party entitled to the benefit of it is prevented from making it available in a court of law; and, that it must be made to appear that forms of law are being used to defeat that which, in equity, constitutes the right.</p> <p>When in a suit in equity brought to restrain the respondent from enforcing against the complainant in an .action at law a demand against which the complainant claims to have an equitable defence which is set forth in the bill, it appears to be altogether uncertain whether the complainant can avail himself in the action at law of the defence asserted in the bill,' the bill should not be dismissed upon general demurrer, but the respondent should be required to answer.</p> <p>B., a citizen of the United States, died in France, having in Europe, lodged with bankers in London and elsewhere, a large amount of personal securities. He left a will naming his widow, his brother J. of Alabama, one S., a citizen of France, and others as executrix and executors. With the knowledge and consent of the widow and of the other' parties interested J. caused the will to be admitted to probate in Alabama, obtained a decree that the decedent was domiciled there, and letters' testamentary were issued to J. only. The Surrogate of New York, upon this probate, .issued ancillary letters testamentary to J.; and, under the. same probate, S., likewise with the widow’s consent, received a power of attorney from J. as executor to take possession of the property in Europe and administer upon the estate there. In pursuance of this authority lie, in company with the widow, proved the will in common form in England and took out letters testamentary there in the name Of himself and the widow, and took possession of the property, among which were registered bonds of the United States to a large amount. The
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is necessary to show some ground of equity other than the estoppel itself....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersNinth Circuit· 1992-06-29· cited 273×
- American Life Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court· 1937-02-01· cited 173×
- Wehrman v. ConklinSupreme Court· 1894-12-10· cited 118×
- Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. LombardEighth Circuit· 1904-07-16· cited 70×
- Rich v. BraxtonSupreme Court· 1895-05-06· cited 57×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1995-07-26· cited 52×
- Jones v. Mutual Fidelity Co.D. Delaware· 1903-05-26· cited 29×
- Warmath v. O'DanielSixth Circuit· 1908-02-20· cited 27×
- Breslin v. Fries-Breslin Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1904-06-20· cited 26×
- E. E. Taenzer & Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Sixth Circuit· 1909-04-19· cited 24×
- Delson v. MinogueE.D. New York· 1961-01-11· cited 21×
- Wright v. BarnardD. Delaware· 1915-12-21· cited 13×
- Wright v. BarnardD. Delaware· 1917-11-07· cited 11×
- Weber v. HertzellEighth Circuit· 1916-02-09· cited 9×
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio· 1899-03-01· cited 9×
- Miller v. SteeleSixth Circuit· 1907-05-15· cited 8×
- Sullivan Timber Co. v. City of MobileU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama· 1901-10-01· cited 7×
- Grant Thornton, LLP v. Federal Deposit InsuranceS.D. West Virginia· 2007-03-14· cited 6×
- Woolsey v. WoolseySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1907-11-18· cited 4×
- Moon v. BWX Technologies, Inc.W.D. Virginia· 2013-07-09· cited 4×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Drexel v. Berney
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Drexel v. BerneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1882-11-17· cited 2×
- Drexel v. BerneyNew York Surrogate's Court· 1883-02-15· cited 1×
- Drexel v. BerneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1883-05-30
- Drexel v. BerneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1888-08-11
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.