· 6/11/1996
Drexel Chemical Co. v. Bituminous Insurance Co.
Citations
- 933 S.W.2d 471
- 1996 Tenn. App. LEXIS 356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the obligation of a liability insurance company to defend an action brought against the insured by a third party is determined solely by the allegations contained in the complaint in that action”
- the duty to defend is determined solely by the factual allegations of the complaint in relation to the language of the insurance policy
- “[T]he scope of our inquiry in determining whether Bituminous possesses a duty to defend is confined to the averments of the pleadings.” (citation omittted)
- “If even one of the allegations [in a complaint against an insured] is covered by the policy, the insurer has a duty to defend” the insured, regardless of how many allegations in the complaint “may be excluded by the policy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Highers, Lillard, Tomlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.