Skip to main content
· 3/29/2001

Drews Distributing, Incorporated,plaintiff-Appellee v. Silicon Gaming, Incorporated

Citations

  • 245 F.3d 347
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 5050
  • 2001 WL 305659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial on the existence of an arbitration agreement is inappropriate where the party opposing arbitration fails to unequivocally deny that an arbitration agreement has been made
  • holding that a trial on the existence of an arbitration agreement is inappropriate where the party opposing arbitration fails to unequivocally deny that an arbitration agreement has been made
  • explaining that there is a “heavy presumption” in favor of arbitrability, and that any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration
  • stating that a trial on the existence of an arbitration agreement is inappropriate where the party opposing arbitration fails to unequivocally deny that an arbitration agreement has been made
  • “the reach of an arbitration clause is not restricted to those causes of action brought under the contract containing the clause, unless the parties draft a clause so restricted in scope”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Motz, Hall, Ninth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.