Drewery v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is “well settled” that this “rule does not prevent a party from attacking on appeal the legal theory upon which the district court based its decision” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing distinction between an ability to appeal an erroneous legal decision, despite an appellant’s failure to respond to a motion to dismiss, and an inability to appeal based on arguments or issues not presented to the district court
• \[A] party generally forfeits an argument or issue not raised in response to a motion to dismiss....\
• \[A] party generally forfeits an argument or issue not raised in response to a motion to dismiss.\
• \[A] party generally forfeits an argument or issue not raised in response to a motion to dismiss.\
• “[A] party generally forfeits an argument or issue not raised in response to a motion to dismiss. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).