Skip to main content
· 10/15/1981

Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 530 F. Supp. 303
  • 211 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1114
  • 10 Fed. R. Serv. 406
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ordering a party to apply for reissue after it has elected to suspend infringement litigation to initiate a reexam on its own is not the same as compelling an unwilling party to return to the PTO after it has chosen an exclusively judicial forum to resolve its infringement claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patrick E. Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.