Skip to main content
· 3/5/1976

Drennen v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Citations

  • 328 So. 2d 52
  • 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding published statement actionable per se where it imputed offense that, under the circumstances', could only indicate stealing or misappropriation of employer’s property
  • directed verdict for defendant on truth defense reversed where plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to submit `issue of truth' to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.