Drennen v. Lindsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• first citing Seattle Sec. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 45 Fed. Cl. 560, 568 (2000), and then citing Labat-Anderson, Inc. v. United States, 42 Fed. Cl. 806, 842 n.54 (1999)
• “Mindful of its role on review, the court will not evaluate the proposal anew, but instead will examine the agency’s evaluation to ensure that it was reasonable and in accord with the evaluation criteria listed in the solicitation.”
• “Mindful of its role on review, the court will not evaluate the proposal anew, but instead will examine the agency’s evaluation to ensure that it was reasonable and in accord with the evaluation criteria listed in the solicitation.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).