· 1/12/1994
Dravo Corporation v. Morton Zuber, Zuber Company, and Burlington Northern Railroad Company
Citations
- 13 F.3d 1222
- 24 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20489
- 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1387
- 37 ERC (BNA) 2073
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 394
- 1994 WL 5152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that, in the de minimis settlement context, a statement of resolution \subject to a condition subsequent\ qualifies as a resolution of liability
- reasoning that, in the de minimis settlement context, a statement of resolution “subject to a condition subsequent” qualifies as a resolution of liability
- “The EPA specifically reserved to itself the right to void the covenant not to sue if it discovers information indicating that the defendants were not eligible for the de minimis agreement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Hansen, McMILLIAN, Richard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.