Skip to main content
· 1/12/1994

Dravo Corporation v. Morton Zuber, Zuber Company, and Burlington Northern Railroad Company

Citations

  • 13 F.3d 1222
  • 24 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20489
  • 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1387
  • 37 ERC (BNA) 2073
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 394
  • 1994 WL 5152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that, in the de minimis settlement context, a statement of resolution \subject to a condition subsequent\ qualifies as a resolution of liability
  • reasoning that, in the de minimis settlement context, a statement of resolution “subject to a condition subsequent” qualifies as a resolution of liability
  • “The EPA specifically reserved to itself the right to void the covenant not to sue if it discovers information indicating that the defendants were not eligible for the de minimis agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Hansen, McMILLIAN, Richard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.