Draphy Durgins v. City of East St. Louis, Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rooker-Feldman does not apply when the only claim is that the state court failed to remedy an injury by some other actor
• holding that Rooker-Feldman does not apply when the only claim is that the state court failed to remedy an injury by some other actor
• holding that Rooker-Feldman does not apply when the only claim is that the state court failed to remedy an injury by some other actor
• finding an East St. Louis police officer’s First Amendment claim was barred by a previous state administrative agency review of her termination
• acknowledging the limitations of administrative review, but noting that constitutional claims joined in such proceedings can be explored in discovery
• “Because Illinois (a) permits the joinder of § 1983 claims with administrative-review actions, and (b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).