Skip to main content
· 12/11/1915

Drake v. Topeka Railway Co.

Citations

  • 96 Kan. 727
  • 153 P. 539
  • 1915 Kan. LEXIS 479

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Street Railway: — Conductor Killed by Drunken Passenger — Assumption of Risk — Liability of Railway Company. A conductor on a street car was shot and mortally wounded hy a drunken passenger who became incensed because mildly remonstrated with by the conductor who in dealing with him followed the rules prescribed by the company for such emergencies, which rules were in effect expressions of the common-law duty of a carrier and in line with the dictates of common humanity. Held, that for the promulgation of such rules and the failure to warn the deceased of the dangers incident to the presence of intoxicated passengers the company is not liable, such rules being proper and such warning being needless.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the character of the hazard—a hole in the carpet in which the plaintiff caught her foot—was sufficient to raise a -5- question of fact regarding notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.