Skip to main content
· 11/12/2004

Drake v. Snider

Citations

  • 608 S.E.2d 191
  • 216 W. Va. 574
  • 2004 W. Va. LEXIS 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing that generally “‘[a] trial court’s decision not to allow further discovery under Rule 56(f) is reviewed on appeal for an abuse of discretion.’” (quoting Franklin D. Cleckley, et al., Litigation Handbook on West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, § 56(f
  • discussing that generally “‘[a] trial court’s decision not to allow further discovery under Rule 56(f) is reviewed on appeal for an abuse of discretion.’” (quoting Franklin D. Cleckley, et al., Litigation Handbook on West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, § 56(f), at 104 (Supp.2004))
  • although the child did not qualify under the first line of State Farm’s “relative” definition since she resided primarily with the other parent, coverage applied because she was away at school

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.