· 2/7/2011
Drake v. Citizens Bank (In Re Corley)
Citations
- 447 B.R. 375
- 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 807
- 2011 WL 802313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding under similar facts and contract language that by language of note and mortgage, beneficial interest remained with lender and its successors and assigns
- dismissing trustee’s argument that note and security deed were split, rendering the note unsecured, where MERS was named grantee and nominee for the lender and lender’s successors and assigns in the Security Deed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.