Skip to main content
· 2/7/2011

Drake v. Citizens Bank (In Re Corley)

Citations

  • 447 B.R. 375
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 807
  • 2011 WL 802313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding under similar facts and contract language that by language of note and mortgage, beneficial interest remained with lender and its successors and assigns
  • dismissing trustee’s argument that note and security deed were split, rendering the note unsecured, where MERS was named grantee and nominee for the lender and lender’s successors and assigns in the Security Deed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.