Drainage District No. 7 v. Terry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that proposed rules “meet neither of the two requirements for final agency action”
• holding that while “EPA ha[d] 12 repeatedly and unequivocally asserted” it had certain legal authority including in memo and preamble of proposed rule, “those EPA statements are not final agency action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).