Drahaus v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure to exhaust administrative remedies is jurisdictional and the failure to timely file a claim divests the court of subject matter jurisdiction
• holding that the failure to exhaust administrative remedies is jurisdictional and the failure to timely file a claim divests the court of subject matter jurisdiction
• holding that the failure to exhaust administrative remedies is jurisdictional and the failure to timely file a claim divests the court of subject matter jurisdiction
• holding that where the legislature has failed to amend a statute in response to a particular interpretation of the statute announced by the court, it is presumed that the “legislature has acquiesced in that interpretation”
• holding that where the legislature has failed to amend a statute in response to a particular interpretation of the statute announced by the court, it is presumed that the “legislature has acquiesced in that interpretation”
• holding that where the legislature has failed to amend a statute in response to a particular interpretation of the statute announced by the court, it is presumed that the “legislature has acquiesced in that interpretation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).