Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/27/2006
Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.
Citations
- 144 P.3d 1279
- 282 Kan. 349
- 2006 Kan. LEXIS 655
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal
- litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve tire issue for appeal
- litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal
- litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal
- litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal
- court may still consider a remand if the lack of specific findings precludes meaningful review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Luckert, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.