Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/27/2006

Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 144 P.3d 1279
  • 282 Kan. 349
  • 2006 Kan. LEXIS 655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal
  • litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve tire issue for appeal
  • litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal
  • litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal
  • litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal
  • court may still consider a remand if the lack of specific findings precludes meaningful review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Luckert, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.