Skip to main content
· 8/17/1966

Drachman v. Jay

Citations

  • 417 P.2d 704
  • 4 Ariz. App. 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rationale for anti-injunction statutes “is that the government not be hampered or interfered with in the collection of revenues so essential to the sustenance of governmental functions”
  • noting distinctions between 1964 anti-injunction statute and earlier statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Molloy, Krucker, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.