Skip to main content
· 8/18/2000

DR Partners v. Board of County Commissioners

Citations

  • 6 P.3d 465
  • 1 Nev. 616
  • 29 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1330
  • 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 72
  • 2000 Nev. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a deliberative process privilege under FOIA Exemption 5 rationale, but finding it inapplicable to documents at issue
  • stating that \[a] district court's decision to grant or deny a writ petition is reviewed by this court under an abuse of discretion standard\
  • recognizing a deliberative process privilege under FOIA Exemption 5 rationale, but finding it inapplicable to documents at issue
  • remanding a case where a public records requester prevailed \for an award to the [requester] of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRS 239.011\
  • remanding a case where a public records requester prevailed \for an award to the [requester] of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRS 239.011\
  • remanding a case where a public records requester prevailed \for an award to the [requester] of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRS 239.011\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agosti, Becker, Leavitt, Maupin, Rose, Shearing, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.