· 8/18/2000
DR Partners v. Board of County Commissioners
Citations
- 6 P.3d 465
- 1 Nev. 616
- 29 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1330
- 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 72
- 2000 Nev. LEXIS 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a deliberative process privilege under FOIA Exemption 5 rationale, but finding it inapplicable to documents at issue
- stating that \[a] district court's decision to grant or deny a writ petition is reviewed by this court under an abuse of discretion standard\
- recognizing a deliberative process privilege under FOIA Exemption 5 rationale, but finding it inapplicable to documents at issue
- remanding a case where a public records requester prevailed \for an award to the [requester] of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRS 239.011\
- remanding a case where a public records requester prevailed \for an award to the [requester] of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRS 239.011\
- remanding a case where a public records requester prevailed \for an award to the [requester] of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to NRS 239.011\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agosti, Becker, Leavitt, Maupin, Rose, Shearing, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.