Skip to main content
· 6/16/1992

Dr. Leo F. Kenneally v. Dan Lungren

Citations

  • 967 F.2d 329
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5045
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 8076
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13489
  • 1992 WL 130559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the § 1094.5 procedure provided the plaintiff a “meaningful opportunity” to raise constitutional claims
  • holding that the § 1094.5 procedure provided the plaintiff a “meaningful opportunity” to raise constitutional claims
  • holding that the “statutory 7 framework [of Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1094.5] provides a meaningful opportunity for [plaintiffs] 8 to present [their] constitutional claims for independent judicial review”
  • finding that the § 1094.5 procedure provided the plaintiff a “meaningful opportunity” to raise constitutional claims
  • applying abstention doctrine in view of pending administrative proceedings to revoke a physician's license
  • dismissing section 1983 action brought by physician to enjoin a state medical board from holding an administrative proceeding to revoke his medical license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Nelson, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.