D.R. Horton-Texas Ltd. v. Markel International Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are “distinct and separate” from each other
• stating that the “analysis of the duty to defend has been strictly circumscribed by the eight-corners doctrine”
• noting that the duty to indemnify is determined by the facts as they are established in the underlying suit
• observing that “the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify ‘are distinct and separate duties’”
• observing that “the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify ‘are distinct and separate duties’”
• concluding failure to present issue to defeat summary judgment in trial court waives issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).