Skip to main content
· 7/27/2009

D.R. Ex Rel. Robinson v. Government of the District of Columbia

Citations

  • 637 F. Supp. 2d 11
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64449
  • 2009 WL 2222680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the defendant’s delay affected the student’s substantive rights because the student’s most recent IEP differed from the one previously issued
  • “A delay does not affect substantive rights if the student’s education would not have been different had there been no delay.”
  • delay in reconsidering plaintiff’s IEP resulted in a violation of his substantive rights because if the IEP had been considered in a timely manner, the plaintiff would have enjoyed the benefits of the revised IEP during the period of delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.