Dr. Endre Ungar v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no clear and convincing evidence because “no reference to the proscription of judicial review” in legislative history of statute or its “relatives”
• legislative history indicating that review preclusion provision was “intended to reduce ... delay in adjudicating claims under the Trading with the Enemy Act” was not a “clear expression of Congress’s desire to prevent the courts from passing upon ... constitutional claims”
• legislative history indicating that review preclusion provision was \intended to reduce ... delay in adjudicating claims under the Trading with the Enemy Act\ was not a \clear expression of Congress's desire to prevent the courts from passing upon ... constitutional claims\
• legislative history indicating that review preclusion provision was \intended to reduce ... delay in adjudicating claims under the Trading with the Enemy Act\ was not a \clear expression of Congress's desire to prevent the courts from passing upon ... constitutional claims\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).