Dr. Emory M. Ghana v. J. T. Holland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate arguments may not be raised for the first time in a reply brief
• determining that arguments not presented in briefs to this Court are abandoned
• discussing our willingness to “construe [a litigant’s] pro se notice of appeal liberally to cover unspecified prior orders that are related to the specified order that was appealed from” (internal quotations and alterations omitted)
• considering a similar question under pre-PLRA law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).