Dr. Elizabeth Guerrero-Berroa v. Save Our Springs Alliance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “where the adjudication is based on a plea,” the youth “must show that but for the inad- equate and ineffective assistance, he would have pleaded differently”
• explaining, in the context of reviewing the validity of an admission, that a youth’s capability of understanding “var[ies] depending on the circumstances of the case, the age and intelligence of Nonprecedential Memo Op: 344 Or App 180 (2025
• explaining, in the context of reviewing the validity of an admission, that a youth’s capability of understanding “var[ies] depending on the circumstances of the case, the age and intelligence of Nonprecedential Memo Op: 344 Or App 180 (2025
• explaining, in the context of reviewing the validity of an admission, that a youth’s capability of understanding “var[ies] depending on the circumstances of the case, the age and intelligence of Nonprecedential Memo Op: 344 Or App 180 (2025) 183 the child, as well as other factors”
• explaining, in the context of reviewing the validity of an admission, that a youth’s capability of understanding “var[ies] depending on the circumstances of the case, the age and intelligence of Nonprecedential Memo Op: 344 Or App 180 (2025) 183 the child, as well as other factors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).