Skip to main content
· 3/4/1987

Dr. Edward A. Pryzina v. Michael Ley

Citations

  • 813 F.2d 821
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing arguments lawyer should or would recognize as clearly groundless may not seem so to pro se appellant
  • agreeing that action challenging tax was barred by the TIA \insofar as the complaint may be construed to seek injunctive relief\ and barred by the principle of comity \[i]nsofar as the complaint seeks declaratory relief or damages\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Wood, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.