DP-Tek, Inc. v. AT & T Global Information Solutions Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, in predicting state law, a court may look to: lower state court decisions and state Supreme Court dicta; any lower court ruling in the case; the general rule on the issue; the rule in other states; and other legal sources
• discussing cases and concluding that “we are convinced the weight of authority supports the conclusion that the wrongful means test of section 768 requires independently actionable conduct”
• no wrongful conduct by defendant when it was not a party to breached confidentiality agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).