Skip to main content
· 8/10/1987

Dozier v. New York City

Citations

  • 130 A.D.2d 128
  • 519 N.Y.S.2d 135
  • 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45074
  • 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] simple rereading of a charge may, in itself, constitute reversible error in that the jurors may have been left without adequate guidance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.