Dozier v. Hodges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court properly denied the motion for new trial, which was based on comments made during closing argument, where the trial court sustained all appropriate objections, gave curative instructions, and the evidence supported the jury’s verdict
• finding that the trial court properly denied a motion for new trial when the trial court sustained all appropriate objections, gave curative instructions where appropriate, and that the evidence supported the jury verdict
• finding allegedly inflammatory and prejudicial comments made during plaintiff's closing argument did not warrant a new trial where the trial court sustained objection and gave a curative instruction to jury
• finding it was proper to exclude officer's estimate of speed even though the expert had been qualified as an expert because he had testified in his deposition that “he took no measurements, made no calculations, and no factual basis for his opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).