Dozier v. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing testimony, “I would say that I cannot say that he’s completely [recovered]” and concluding that “[t]his testimony, while admittedly not a model of clarity, is not equivocal.”
• when determining whether expert testimony is equivocal “we must examine the entire testimony of a witness as a whole and not rely upon a fragment of testimony removed from its context”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).