Doyle v. Scutt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n short, petitioner had no federal constitutional right to be sentenced within Michigan’s guideline minimum sentence recommendations.”
• a habeas court could set aside, “on allegations of unfairness or an abuse of discretion, terms of a sentence that is within state statutory limits unless the sentence is so disproportionate to the crime as to be completely arbitrary and shocking.”
• denial of counsel to petitioner at arraignments on the warrant did not entitle habeas petitioner of relief, given that petitioner did not make any incriminating statement at his arraignments or lose any available defenses by not pleading them at his arraignments
• both citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 (1969)
• both citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 (1969)
• both citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 (1969)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).