Doyle v. Owens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unpreserved claims of constitutional magnitude may be raised for first time on appeal if, inter alia, record is adequate for review
• noting that unpreserved claim may be reviewed only if, inter alia, “the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error”
• requiring that “alleged constitutional violation clearly exists and clearly deprived the defendant of a fair trial”
• observing that nonconstitutional claims ‘‘do not war- rant special consideration simply because they bear a constitutional label’’
• declining to review defendant’s claim pursuant to Golding or plain error doctrine because defendant had not adequately briefed claim
• establishing requirements for defendant to prevail on claim of consti- tutional error not preserved at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).