Doyle v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the denial of unemployment benefits cannot be based exclusively on hearsay evidence
• stating that \when documentation is offered as the sole evidentiary support for a finding of misconduct... it can only be used as a basis for disqualification if it is properly admitted under one of the hearsay exceptions\
• to meet the employer's burden, the employer has to show more than an employee's inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, or failure to perform in the work place
• \The fact that an employee does not object to the admissibility of such critical documentary evidence does not preclude an appellate court from considering the sufficiency of the evidence to support the UAC's decision.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).