Doyle v. Department of Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court need not consider statements of material facts that do not comply with Rule 56
• upholding summary judgment for employer notwithstanding \close proximity\ between protected activity and adverse employment action
• responding “yes,” to the questions “And that was the first time that you told your supervisor? — about Mr. Damon?— and the problems you were having?”
• affirming trial court’s determination that failure to comply with the form requirements of Rule 56(h) warranted disregarding many SMF
• \The fact that plaintiff's abuse was motivated by gender neutral reasons is irrelevant.\
• involving a sex-for-money proposal by the employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).