Doxsey v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing district court’s construction, which applied the standard significant figures rounding convention to the claimed percentage; crediting the specification’s disparagement of deviation within the rounding range and construing the term to apply to a narrower range
• “[E]ven in the absence of a clear and unmistakable disavowal, . . . the prosecution history can be evaluated to determine how a person of ordinary skill would understand a given claim term.”
• “[A]ny explanation, elaboration, or qualification pre- sented by the inventor during patent examination is rele- vant, for the role of claim construction is to capture the scope of the actual invention that is disclosed, described, and patented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).