· 12/7/1970
Downs v. Ziegler
Citations
- 477 P.2d 261
- 13 Ariz. App. 387
- 1970 Ariz. App. LEXIS 850
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he presence of a subsisting obligation” is “[o]f primary importance in Arizona in determining whether a transaction was intended to be a security device, i.e., a mortgage, or an absolute conveyance.”
- “Of primary importance in Arizona in determining whether a transaction was intended to be a security device, i.e., a mortgage, or an absolute conveyance is the presence of a subsisting obligation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haire, Eubank, Jacobson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.