Skip to main content
· 12/7/1970

Downs v. Ziegler

Citations

  • 477 P.2d 261
  • 13 Ariz. App. 387
  • 1970 Ariz. App. LEXIS 850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he presence of a subsisting obligation” is “[o]f primary importance in Arizona in determining whether a transaction was intended to be a security device, i.e., a mortgage, or an absolute conveyance.”
  • “Of primary importance in Arizona in determining whether a transaction was intended to be a security device, i.e., a mortgage, or an absolute conveyance is the presence of a subsisting obligation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haire, Eubank, Jacobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.