Skip to main content
· 3/22/1996

Downs v. Westphal

Citations

  • 78 F.3d 1252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that pro se litigants do not have “unbridled license to disregard clearly communicated court orders,” or to “choose which of the court’s rules and orders [they] will follow, and which [they] will willfully disregard”
  • stressing that “being a pro se litigant does not give a party unbridled license to disregard clearly communicated court orders,” or to “choose which of the court’s rules and orders it will follow, and which it will wilfully disregard”
  • “being a pro se litigant does not give a party unbridled license to disregard clearly communicated court orders,” or to “choose which of the court's rules and orders it will follow”
  • “pro se litigants are not entitled to a general dispensation from the rules of procedure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.