Downs v. a & H Construction, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as a matter of law that defendant owner owed no duty of care because it had surrendered control to a general contractor without retaining enough control to qualify as a possessor of land
• addressing the issue of whether a general contractor retained ―sufficient control over‖ a building project to owe possessor duties to the employee of a subcontractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).