Michigan Court of Appeals· 4/30/1998
Downey v. Charlevoix County Board
Citations
- 576 N.W.2d 712
- 227 Mich. App. 621
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statements such as “[i]f I have to, I will get rid of the older guys—you older guys and replace you with younger ones” were direct evidence of discrimination
- finding that the employer’s agent acted on his predisposition towards age discrimination when he repeatedly stated that he was going to “get rid” of all the older workers
- “racial slurs by a decision maker constitute direct evidence of racial discrimination that is sufficient to get the plaintiff’s case to a jury”
- “Although federal precedence interpreting the federal Civil Rights Act is not binding on Michigan courts interpreting our own civil rights statutes, federal precedence can be used as a guidance by Michigan courts.”
- “Although federal precedence interpreting the federal Civil Rights Act is not binding on Michigan courts interpreting our own civil rights statutes, federal precedence can be used as a guidance by Michigan courts.”
- applying these elements in a case involving handicap discrimination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanagh, Holbrook, Jansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. CSX Transportation Co.Sixth Circuit· 2011-06-28· cited 217×
- Blair v. Henry Filters, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2007-10-15· cited 173×
- Betts v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Sixth Circuit· 2009-03-05· cited 171×
- Wilcoxon v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-07-27· cited 105×
- Wayne Hein v. All America Plywood Company, Incorporated Kurt Adam Ludwinski, Jointly and SeverallySixth Circuit· 2000-11-14· cited 99×
- Major v. Village of NewberryMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-08-02· cited 73×
- Mulcahy v. VerhinesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-11-27· cited 60×
- Haynie v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-06-11· cited 56×
- Dawson v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-08-16· cited 33×
- Geralds v. Munson HealthcareMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-01-08· cited 29×
- United States Ex Rel. Diop v. Wayne County Community College DistrictE.D. Michigan· 2003-01-31· cited 22×
- Lamoria v. Health Care & Retirement Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-10-07· cited 15×
- Clerc v. Chippewa County War Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-11-10· cited 13×
- Kenneth Lowe v. Walbro LLCSixth Circuit· 2020-08-26· cited 12×
- Gibbs v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 2014-10-09· cited 10×
- Tyson Foods, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-11-27· cited 9×
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals· 2010-06-15· cited 9×
- Steinmann v. SteinmannMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-10-16· cited 7×
- Dumas v. Hurley Medical CenterE.D. Michigan· 2011-07-26· cited 7×
- Figgins v. Advance America Cash Advance Centers of Michigan, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 2007-03-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.