Skip to main content
· 11/10/1986

Dow v. Chilili Cooperative Ass'n

Citations

  • 105 N.W. 52
  • 105 N.M. 52
  • 728 P.2d 462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a party opposing summary judgment may not simply argue that evidentiary facts requiring a trial on the merits may exist
  • explaining that a party opposing summary judgment may not simply argue that evidentiary facts requiring a trial on the merits may exist
  • explaining that a party opposing 12 1 summary judgment may not simply argue that evidentiary facts requiring a trial on the 2 merits may exist
  • stating that summary judgment is not refuted by simply arguing that there are evidentiary facts requiring trial
  • stating that a party opposing summary judgment may 11 not simply argue that evidentiary facts requiring trial on the merits exist, nor may it 12 rely on allegations of the complaint
  • stating that a party opposing may not simply argue that evidentiary facts 4 requiring a trial on the merits may exist, “nor may [a party] rest upon the allegations 5 of the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sosa, Riordan, Federici

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.