Dow Chemical v. Consumer Product Safety Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing informal rulemaking process as channel for participation by public, experts, and other constituencies to provide information on effects of proposed rules and to suggest alternatives
• observing that 15 U.S.C. § 2060(a) does not bar APA review by district courts
• Consumer Product Safety Commission’s classification of suspected carcinogens would have immediate “compelling impact” on plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).