Dow Chemical Co. v. Exxon Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that injury plaintiffs alleged injury was too speculative under RICO where it depended upon “intervening decisions” by government agencies, which, in that case, involved “discretion whether or not to grant patent property rights”
• rejecting argument that a corporation may be held liable for racketeering through association-in-fact composed of corporation, employees, subsidiaries and affiliates
• distinguishing direct injury from indirect injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).