· 12/27/1991
Dow Chemical Co. v. Department of Revenue
Citations
- 586 N.E.2d 516
- 224 Ill. App. 3d 263
- 166 Ill. Dec. 558
- 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 2138
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in interpreting a statute “each part of a statute [is read] in light of every other provision, so that the entire statute is construed to produce a harmonious whole”
- in interpreting a statute, “each part of a statute [is read] in light of every other provision, [so that] the entire statute [is] construed to produce a harmonious whole”
- in interpreting a statute “each part of a statute [is read] in light of every other provision, so that the entire statute is construed to produce a harmonious whole”
- in interpreting a statute “each part of a statute [is read] in light of every other provision, [so that] the entire statute [is] construed to produce a harmonious whole”
- no exceptions which toll statute of limitations or enlarge its scope will be implied
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McNULTY
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.