Skip to main content
· 12/27/1991

Dow Chemical Co. v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 586 N.E.2d 516
  • 224 Ill. App. 3d 263
  • 166 Ill. Dec. 558
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 2138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in interpreting a statute “each part of a statute [is read] in light of every other provision, so that the entire statute is construed to produce a harmonious whole”
  • in interpreting a statute, “each part of a statute [is read] in light of every other provision, [so that] the entire statute [is] construed to produce a harmonious whole”
  • in interpreting a statute “each part of a statute [is read] in light of every other provision, so that the entire statute is construed to produce a harmonious whole”
  • in interpreting a statute “each part of a statute [is read] in light of every other provision, [so that] the entire statute [is] construed to produce a harmonious whole”
  • no exceptions which toll statute of limitations or enlarge its scope will be implied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNULTY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.