Skip to main content
· 3/31/2003

Dow Chemical Co. and Subsidiaries v. United States

Citations

  • 250 F. Supp. 2d 748
  • 91 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1489
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4880
  • 2003 WL 1701524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Asserting that a statement is offered as impeachment will not alone establish an exception to Rule 408.”
  • finding that “Rule 408 does not bar evidence of a settlement when offered to prove a breach of the settlement agreement, as the purpose of the evidence is to prove the fact of settlement as opposed to the validity or amount of the underlying claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.